⏳ The gate (build-only whitelist + destructive-block + no-probe) — designed, not yet applied. I have the full design: a forced-command wrapper
  (aiq_build_gate) pinned to the Hetzner key that accepts only a structured AIQOP <verb> protocol (status / api / emu / mksrc / gitpull / shot +
  tightly-constrained rsync-into-source-root and scp-of-uploads) and refuses everything else — so rm, nmap, arbitrary shell simply have no verb to run
  through. The build itself still runs its commands in the encrypted sandbox.

  My recommendation

  This gate is a forced-command lockdown + a transport change to reactor-build (which 50 reactors now depend on) + security-tricky rsync/scp gating.
  That's exactly the kind of thing I should build and test carefully, not rush at the end of a very long session — a subtle bug is either a lockout or
  a bypass. The good news: your recovery break-glass is already proven, so when I build it there's zero lockout risk.

  Two ways to go — your call:

 ☐ The gate 

The anti-lockout + hardened posture are done and verified. The build-only gate is a security-critical forced-command + reactor-build transport change.
How do you want to proceed?

❯ 1. Build the gate now
     I proceed to build aiq_build_gate + rework reactor-build's transport to the AIQOP whitelist, deploy, test every reactor op through it, then pin 
     the Hetzner key to it. Careful and methodical, but it's a big build this session.
  2. Checkpoint here
     Stop at the verified anti-lockout + tight posture (Hetzner-key-only, tunnel-only, firewall, no-forwarding, recovery break-glass). I build+test 
     the gate as a focused next session so it's done right, not rushed.
  3. Encryption audit first
     Before the gate, verify/enforce full-stage encryption (build spaces, logs, findings, artifacts — local + remote), then do the gate after.
  4. Type something.

  5. Chat about this

Enter to select · ↑/↓ to navigate · Esc to cancel